Was Russia’s decision to cut off natural gas exports a mistake?

Last week, Russia announced it would halt natural gas supplies to Poland and Bulgaria after the two countries refused to comply with its request to make export payments in roubles, the national currency of Russia. It is the latest maneuver off the battlefield to retaliate against Western efforts to weaken the country even as its armed forces keep getting slowed down by Ukrainian troops in the beleaguered eastern territory of Donbass.

Russia has largely succeeded in maintaining diplomatic relations in the Asia-Pacific region with China and India, its biggest allies, despite Western sanctions. But his decision to cut energy exports has strengthened Europe’s alliance with the United States, especially as Europe continues its deliberations on additional sanctions against Russia.

The Kremlin defended the move was a necessary step to protect Russia’s financial reserves following heavy sanctions.

“They blocked our accounts, or – to put it in Russian – they ‘stole’ a significant part of our reserves,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the media during a press call.

Europe imports a third of its oil and gas from Russia, but that hasn’t deterred it from using sanctions as a tool to stop the country’s aggression in Ukraine. The European Union has already launched five rounds of economic sanctions against Russia and is expected to introduce more sanctions in the coming weeks.

Russia’s decision to cut off gas exports to Poland and Bulgaria – the latter having remained undecided in its stance on Russia until the recent ban – is a risky move meant to serve as a warning to other European countries. But some experts called the decision a miscalculation.

According to Yoshiko Herrera, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who specializes in Eurasian politics, this could have the intended opposite effect.

“One of the key arguments for people who are in favor of additional energy sanctions is to say that Russia is an untrustworthy partner, that they are using energy as a political tool,” Herrera said. “So by cutting off the gas to Poland and Bulgaria, they are sort of pretending that they are not reliable partners.”

Although no formal proposal has been made, Bloomberg reports the EU will likely introduce a ban on Russian oil by the end of the year, gradually limiting its imports until then.

“Comprehensive European energy sanctions would really hurt [Russia’s] economy and hurt their ability to wage war because they will run out of money. So I think that’s something Russia has to worry about,” Herrera said. “Their continued misbehavior in Ukraine, the atrocities are what I think are causing Europe to change its stance quite drastically on things, on energy.”

Russia has maintained allies since its invasion of Ukraine

Screens show the passage of the UN resolution to withdraw Russia from the UN Human Rights Council following a General Assembly vote on April 7, 2022.
Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images

Despite widespread condemnation and efforts by Western powers to isolate Russia, the country has managed to retain allies. In April, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution to suspend Russia from the Human Rights Council for its invasion of Ukraine. The resolution was successful after has received a two-thirds majority of member state votes with 93 nations voting in favor of suspending Russia from the body. But 24 of the body members voted against the action while 58 members abstained from the vote altogether.

The results of the UN vote signify the complexities of real-world diplomacy, even in the face of war. Countries in Africa, South America and Asia have increasingly sought to resist taking sides as the Russian-Ukrainian war threatens to shape the world into political factions. But the West’s waning influence in other parts of the globe, combined with the economic and political interests at stake, has led many countries to choose to maintain independence regarding relations with Russia.

In Asia, where growing vigilance over China’s growing influence is shared across borders, nations in the southeast and south of the continent have Express their intention to remain on good terms with Russia despite the situation with Ukraine. Among Russia’s staunchest allies is India, with whom it has maintained a strong alliance since the Soviet Union’s support of India during the 1971 war with Pakistan.

Another factor behind their continued friendship is India addiction about Russia as a supplier of military weapons – from the 1950s to today, the country has received about 65 percent firearms exports from the Soviet Union or Russia, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. India’s border disputes in the Himalayas with China, which have sparked a bloody confrontation in 2020, is another motivating factor for India as Russia has played the role of an important mediator in the conflict with China.

The close ties between India and Russia pose challenges to Western powers since India is seen as a vital partner to restrict Russian influence in the region.

China, another key Russian ally, has refrained from outright condemnation of Russia, instead calling on the warring countries to reach a peaceful resolution. During a virtual meeting in March with France and Germany, President Xi Jinping called for “maximum restraint” on the issue and expressed concerns about the wider impact of the sanctions on Russia. But some, like Herrera, doubt the extent to which China will continue to toe the line if things get worse.

“China hasn’t said it won’t abide by the sanctions and so far it’s accepting the sanctions against Russia,” Herrera said. A potential turning point, she said, could be Europe’s next sanctions, especially the secondary sanctions it imposes, which will be “a big crossroads for China to decide whether or not to participate in these. “.

But its ties to Russia could still end up serving China economically. President Vladimir Putin has declared Russia will “redirect” its energy exports to “fast-growing markets” elsewhere to help oppose sanctions, perhaps in an effort to maintain support from its key ally.

Russian forces continue to face military obstacles in Ukraine

After two months of conflict, tensions on the warfront between Russia and Ukraine have shown no signs of escalating. The Russian armed forces have focused in recent weeks on take control of eastern Ukrainecalled Donbass territory, where fighting between Ukrainian troops and Russian-backed separatists had been ongoing since 2014.

Russia also continued its lead over Kyiv, launch an air strike on the capital last week during a diplomatic visit by UN Secretary General António Guterres. The attack was widely condemned as a needless act of aggression by Russian forces.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who met Guterres during his visit to the capital, accused Russia of deliberately trying to humiliate the UN.

“It says a lot about Russia’s true attitude towards global institutions, about Russian leaders’ efforts to humiliate the UN and everything the organization stands for. It requires a strong response,” Zelenskyy declared during a public address after the airstrike.

Former UN Under-Secretary-General Mark Malloch-Brown said the international community “will recognize that it cannot see its UN Secretary-General treated in this disrespectful, flippant and downright dangerous manner, by Putin “.

With the conflict showing no signs of abating, last week US President Joe Biden asked Congress must send an additional $33 billion in military aid to support Ukraine’s military defenses. Biden’s proposal, which includes strategies to potentially use funds seized from Russian oligarchs to fund Ukraine’s military operations, is more than double the $13.6 billion in military and humanitarian aid already approved by Congress last month.

Herrera thinks an extra boost could be hugely helpful to Ukraine, both strategically and physically, even this far into the war. Combined with energy sanctions by Europe, she said Russia could face significant obstacles to achieving its goals because “it would make a big difference in Russia’s ability to wage war.”